A.k.a Pifagor - Telegram channel avatar
@aka_pifagor

A.k.a Pifagor

15 364 Subscribers · Post: October 24
7/10Reviewed on
LevelPro
LanguageUkrainian
Risk levelHigh Risk
PrivacyPublic
TypeChannel
Categories
TradingArbitrageNFT & GameFiEcosystemsSoftware
Content Type
SignalsOpinions / Blog

Автор не несе відповідальності за ваші фінансові рішення 👤Контакт - @pifagor_dao 🛒PIFA SHOP - @pifashop_bot 🎥Ютуб - https://www.youtube.com/@aka_pifagor 🔗Посилання другу - https://t.me/+1im9cz1LiaY2MDE6

Market Filter
Market Filter Rating
7/10Good
Reviewed on
Difficulty
Pro
Risk level
High Risk
Category
TradingArbitrageNFT & GameFiEcosystemsSoftware
Content Type
SignalsOpinions / Blog
Telegram
TypeChannel
Subscribers15 364
LanguageUkrainian
PrivacyPublic
Last postOctober 24
StatisticsUpdated today
Post views
4 573Engagement 30%
Forwards per post
32.8Total in 30 days: 295
Posts per day
once every 3 daysAverage over 30 daysLast post: 3 days ago
Subscriber growth
+751+5.1% since October 8
Key Strength and Weakness
Key Strength
We have real-world experience, our own tools, a dynamic response to the market, and content that comes from action, not from rewriting other people's posts.
Key Weakness
High barrier to entry. Many of the ideas discussed here require experience, quick thinking, an understanding of market mechanisms, and a willingness to take on higher risk; therefore, a significant portion of the content will not be useful to all readers.
Editorial review

A.k.a Pifagor (@aka_pifagor) — a personal channel about the crypto market that shares practical ideas for making money: arbitrage, trading strategies, speculative trades, and working with NFTs and exchange-traded instruments. The channel is built around Pifagor’s persona and is linked to his own crypto services and ongoing projects. The content is dynamic and practical, but presented in complex language and aimed primarily at an experienced audience. The main drawbacks are the high risk associated with the ideas, the blurring of the line between personal content and advertising, and a decline in the frequency of posts.

Content and Format

From his posts, it’s clear that the author is working on several fronts at once: he publishes trades on Gate, Lighter, Hyperliquid, and other platforms; highlights arbitrage opportunities—that is, price differences between two markets; and writes about his own software and parsers for identifying such opportunities. This isn’t an educational channel or a media outlet, but rather a work diary of someone who lives and breathes the market and writes as events unfold.

The strength of this format lies in its specificity. Posts often include the entry price, stop-loss level, partial profit-taking, a description of the risk, and a brief explanation of why the idea came about in the first place. An inexperienced reader may not understand exactly what is happening, why a particular position was opened, or at what point the idea is no longer relevant. This is particularly noticeable in posts about funding—that is, periodic payments between participants in the futures market—and in posts about hedging (insuring one position with another trade on a different exchange).

While there used to be 15–20 posts per month, activity is now noticeably lower. This aligns with the content of the posts themselves: the author explicitly states that he has stopped sharing some of his profitable ventures publicly and is now working within a smaller circle. As a result, the channel has become less stable as a public product: engagement remains high, and the comments are lively, but the volume of useful public content no longer seems consistent.

Monetization and Business Model

The channel’s monetization model is mixed. First, the creator has his own ecosystem: the Pifagor Agency marketing DAO and the PIFA SHOP, which offers KYC services. Second, the channel features advertising integration, and the ads are often presented not as formal banners but as personal ideas accompanied by commentary on risk, returns, and the creator’s own involvement. This makes the advertising more convincing, but at the same time blurs the line between personal experience and promoting someone else’s project.

Monetization relies not only on direct advertising but also on driving traffic to transactions. When a creator showcases bundles, farming, sales, or NFT mechanics, they are effectively directing their audience toward specific tools and platforms. Sometimes this takes the form of an honest analysis with caveats; other times, it involves engaging in highly speculative models where the outcome depends heavily on liquidity, luck, and the behavior of the organizers.

  • proprietary services and a DAO centered around a personal brand;

  • advertising posts integrated into the general content feed;

  • potential indirect monetization through traffic to exchanges, sales, NFTs, and trading bundles;

  • Developing software and parsers as a standalone, valuable product for its audience.

Reputation, Risks, and Key Features

The channel’s reputation rests on the author’s personal reputation. Pythagoras is a prominent member of the Russian- and Ukrainian-speaking crypto communities. Comments are open, the audience is active, the author responds personally, and this works to the channel’s advantage: it doesn’t look abandoned or artificially inflated.

That said, there are plenty of risks. The history of multiple name changes shows that the project struggled for a long time to find its niche. The feed is full of content with a high barrier to entry: arbitrage via smart contracts, managing dozens of accounts, risky sales, and speculation on illiquid tokens—that is, assets where prices can fluctuate sharply due to low trading volumes. Plus, some of the promotional examples involve dubious and highly volatile scenarios, where even the author himself acknowledges the possibility of manipulation by the team or the market. This isn’t a direct sign of a scam, but it’s a gray area where users need to be able to rigorously filter ideas on their own.

Conclusion

A.k.a Pifagor is a high-quality, author-driven channel aimed at an experienced audience that already understands the mechanics of exchanges, arbitrage strategies, and short-term market ideas. It can be useful as a window into the real-world operations of a crypto speculator, but it’s not a good fit for someone looking for consistent analysis, clear instruction, and a transparent system for selecting ideas.

Information

Rating and status history

DateRatingChannel status
7/10High RiskNow

Entries are never edited and never deleted, so you can see how our view changed.

Our Methodology

We check channels against an internal checklist of 44 parameters: we analyze audience dynamics, content quality and nature, authorship transparency, promotion methods, and signs of potential risk. The final score is based on the combination of criteria and reflects the channel's overall reliability and quality.

Learn more about our methodology
Posted on Market Filter:10/8/2026
Last Updated:10/23/2026

Collaboration

We analyze channels and gather up-to-date information about them. Want to add a channel or discuss a partnership? Write to us.